Workplace Health & Wellbeing
From Descriptive to Prescriptive: The Evolution of Pre-Employment Risk Intelligence
Financial stress is no longer just a personal issue — it’s impacting workplace wellbeing, productivity,
Blog
Remote Work:
Is Your Remote Work Policy a WHS Risk? The Evidence Says It Might Be
Remote work offers flexibility, but new research suggests it may also increase isolation and psychological distress. Learn what this means for WHS compliance and employee wellbeing.
Share this Article:
Remote Work, Isolation, and Mental Health
Most Australian businesses have done the work on remote work ergonomics. Standing desks, monitor heights, chair assessments — the physical side of working from home is reasonably well understood and, in many organisations, reasonably well managed.
The psychosocial side is a different story.
New research published in Science — one of the most rigorous studies on remote work to date — examined 588,000 American workers across a 13-year period and reached a conclusion that should be on the desk of every HR manager and WHS practitioner in the country: remote work significantly increases social isolation and mental distress, and most workers don’t see it coming.
What the Research Found
The study compared workers in roles that can be done remotely — think marketing, software development, administrative roles — against those in roles requiring physical presence. The findings were stark.
Remote-capable workers spent roughly one additional hour alone every single workday compared to their on-site counterparts. They were significantly more likely to spend an entire day without meaningful human contact. They reduced after-work socialising. And their rates of psychological distress, mental health care utilisation, and antidepressant prescriptions all rose materially.
For workers living alone, the impact was more than doubled. The likelihood of going an entire day without any human contact — not a colleague, not a barista, not a passing conversation — rose by 83%.
Perhaps most importantly, the research estimates that the rise of remote work explains approximately a third of the overall increase in mental distress recorded in the population between 2019 and 2024.
This is not a minor finding.
The Hidden Problem: Workers Don't Know It's Happening
One of the most important insights in this research is the gap between worker preference and worker wellbeing.
Most people say they prefer remote work. They’ll accept a pay cut to keep it. They report higher job satisfaction when working from home. And yet their mental health is quietly deteriorating.
The researchers explain why: the benefits of remote work — no commute, flexibility, autonomy — are immediate and visible. The costs — eroding workplace relationships, accumulating isolation, the slow loss of incidental human connection — are gradual and invisible. By the time the impact is felt, it’s hard to trace back to where it came from.
This is precisely why it’s a WHS issue, not just a personal one. Workers cannot be expected to self-identify and self-manage a risk they don’t perceive in real time.
What This Means Under Australian WHS Law
Under the Work Health and Safety Act and the corresponding regulations across Australian jurisdictions, employers have a primary duty of care to eliminate or minimise risks to psychological health — so far as is reasonably practicable.
Safe Work Australia specifically identifies psychosocial hazards such as isolation, poor support, and remote or isolated work as recognised workplace hazards that employers must identify, assess and control.
The shift to remote and hybrid work has, for many organisations, materially increased exposure to those hazards without a corresponding update to risk controls.
The Compliance Gap
Put plainly: if your organisation moved to hybrid or remote work arrangements post-pandemic and hasn’t formally reviewed and updated its psychosocial risk assessment to reflect that change, there is likely a compliance gap — and more importantly, a genuine risk to your people.
What a Proper Risk Control Framework Looks Like
Managing psychosocial risk for remote workers isn’t about mandating return-to-office. It’s about applying the same rigour to psychological hazards that you’d apply to physical ones.
1. Conduct a formal psychosocial risk assessment for remote roles
This should go beyond a generic survey. It should identify which roles carry elevated isolation risk, assess individual circumstances (including whether employees live alone), and document the controls in place.
2. Establish minimum connection standards
Ad hoc check-ins are not a control. Organisations with mature remote work programs set minimum expectations around live team interaction — not just email and Slack — to ensure workers have regular, genuine human contact as part of their working week.
3. Train managers to identify early indicators
The research shows that distress accumulates gradually and isn’t always visible. Managers working with remote teams need specific training in recognising early warning signs — withdrawal, reduced communication, declining output — that may indicate a worker struggling with isolation.
4. Review individual risk for solo remote workers
The data is clear that workers living alone face a significantly elevated risk. This doesn’t require organisations to know employees’ living arrangements in detail, but it does warrant a more proactive check-in protocol for employees identified as higher risk.
5. Create structured opportunities for incidental connection
One of the losses the research identifies is what it calls “ambient socialising” — the casual, unplanned human contact of a shared workspace. Structured team days, intentional social touchpoints, and even informal virtual catch-ups can partially offset this loss when designed well.
6. Include remote work in your annual WHS review cycle
Psychosocial risk from remote work is not a set-and-forget issue. As team compositions change, as employees’ personal circumstances shift, and as the proportion of remote work in your organisation evolves, the risk profile changes too.
The Business Case Beyond Compliance
Beyond the legal obligation, the operational case is straightforward. Mental distress drives absenteeism, presenteeism, and attrition — three of the most costly workforce outcomes any business faces. The research shows that elevated distress among remote workers correlates with increased use of mental health services and prescription medication. These are not abstract statistics. They represent real cost and real disruption inside your organisation.
Proactive psychosocial risk management for remote workers is not a nice-to-have. It is sound workforce strategy.
How Employ Health Can Help
Employ Health works with organisations across Australia to assess, design, and implement workplace health programs that go beyond the physical. Our team can support you to:
- Conduct a psychosocial risk assessment tailored to your remote and hybrid workforce
- Develop manager capability to identify and respond to early warning signs
- Design connection and wellbeing frameworks that meet WHS obligations and genuinely support your people
- Integrate remote work health risk into your existing WHS management system
REMOTE & HYBRID WORKPLACE HEALTH
Understand Your Remote Work Risks Before They Become Workplace Issues
Remote and hybrid work can improve flexibility, but they also introduce new psychosocial risks that organisations can’t afford to overlook. If you’d like to understand where your organisation sits on this issue, we’d welcome the conversation.
Talk to our team.
Table of Contents
Read the latest articles
Data and Technology, Injury Prevention, Workplace Safety
How AI and Machine Learning Are Transforming Onsite Physiotherapy and Workplace Health
Financial stress is no longer just a personal issue — it’s impacting workplace wellbeing, productivity,
Occupational Health
Why Contractor-Based Workplace Health Could Be Costing Your Business More
Financial stress is no longer just a personal issue — it’s impacting workplace wellbeing, productivity,
Workforce Risk Management
Offshore Pre-Employment Screening
Delayed reporting is the quietest cost driver in workplace injury management. Here's what the evidence